Take as a model the creations left to us by the famous men of old and, considering the suggestions of the owner of the house (where the garden is to be made), one must create, exercising one's own aesthetic senses (from Sakuteiki 5 ) in [1, 2].
This section is divided into two chapters. This first subsection is a general method for (Japanese) garden realization, including typification of your Japanese garden. The second part reflects how we used the method to realize Tsubo-en.
Statement of caution: Creating and maintaining
a Japanese garden not only requires knowledge and
preferably experience, you also need to develop a
feel for it. Part of that feel is influenced by
culture, religion and mysticism. So this will be hard
to develop in the western world. There is a Zen
saying: "all said about Zen is said to
much".
Hence the method described here offers some guidance
and something to hold on to but will only lead to
success if and when combined with the right "feel",
or better "fuzei" 8
Interestingly my profession of IT
Architect has little to do with garden design and
gardening. Not knowing much about the education of
horticulturists, garden architects etc. we approached
the realization of Tsubo-en as a project, in the very
same way as I would have executed an Information
Technology (IT) project. Although much of this will
often be done in an implied fashion, when phases are
skipped or not done properly, the result will not be
as desired. For that reason we advise to make the
phases explicit. For us Tsubo-en fulfills our initial
vision and desire.
Our first experience with a Japanese garden (being
our 4th garden) dates back to 1983 ¹
where we introduced Japanese Garden Elements
into our existing garden. So this garden
evolved and so did our interest for and knowledge of
Japan and the Japanese garden.
Our first full Japanese Garden was developed from
1987 until 1996. This garden was developed from an
initial design and included scenes [1] and
elements of different garden (arche)types, karesansui, tea garden
elements, a pond and o-karikomi etc. In 1991 we had
our first trip to Japan and pilgrimage to temples and
gardens ¹. We made some modifications and
refinements to the then named Tsubo-en garden.
Based on our knowledge and the experience with
previous Japanese gardens in combination with my
professional experience as IT Architect, the current
Tsubo-en, shown on these pages, was designed in a
structured way according to the method described
below. We think that following this methodology in
combination with the developed skills and "feel".
brought us what we wanted. We are also convinced that
the method is repeatable, and not just for Japanese
gardens. When we started with Tsubo-en information on
the Internet about this subject was very scares and
most information came from the excellent literature
and also from Japanese gardens outside Japan.
These days typing in a single search term brings up
an incredible amount of pages bringing more or less
relevant information, including the most beautiful
photos from Japanese gardens in and outside Japan.
And again this site adds to that amount. Therefore we
hope that our aim to show a structured method based
on our own knowledge and experience for the
realization of a Japanese garden will reduce the time
you need and enhance the quality of your end
result.
The method should not be applied as a so called
"waterfall-method", that is progressing from one
phase to the other without looking back. The
process should be executed as an iterative
methodology, that is a continuous re-evaluation
after each phase to see if it has an impact on any
previous phase, that then should be propagated, that
is that impact of the previous phase may impact both
forward and backward, especially over time.
A simple example is maintenance and tuning where you may have to go back to "Visible-object selection" just due to the fact that a plant choice proved to be wrong or an aging effect that has a very different outcome than was expected. But also going back from architecture to the strategy because you find out that a specific choice is just not feasible.
In the following sections we give a short general description of each of the six realization-phases. We will elaborate on these phases with the for Tsubo-en most important considerations and decisions in a separate chapter Specifics on the realization of Tsubo-en.|
|
|||||
|
|
|
![]()
|
|
|
|
- 1- Determine the vision and strategy |
- 2 - Design the architecture |
- 3 - Design and select the visible-objects and elements |
- 4 - Infrastructure design and component selection |
- 5 - Build and construction of the integral design |
- 6 - Maintenance and tuning |
Definition: A scene refers to a landscape that forms a complete, stand alone, entity. It may be a natural (scaled-down) composition to be found in real nature, one that originates from a painting, or one that is a product of the imagination, a so called mindscape. An element is defined as a complete, more or less, solitary part of an archetype (see typification below) or scene. A "logical" or "re-used" combination of these can be regarded as scenes. Borrowed scenery (by means of the Shakkei technique) is regarded an external or remote scene or element. Elements are composed of (visible) objects, which constitutes the smallest entity in a garden. The three basic natural objects are plants, water and stone (from rock and stone to sand and gravel). Other mostly artificial objects are for instance a house, ornaments and enclosures. We use the term component to indicate an infrastructure building block that in most cases will not be visible to the beholder.
Infrastructure design and
component selection.
What do we need to support the construction and
Life Cycle of the above ? (In IT this is called
Life Cycle Management (LCM). This is about the
initial construction and the maintenance.
Selection of the infrastructure components, that
is the non- or less visible components, is part
of this phase.
At this stage we also must decide on the order
and timing of the work that needs to be done.
What are the dependencies, what is the logical
order of activities etc.
Build and construction of the
integral design.
This is the execution of the real groundwork,
digging, buying, planting, cable-laying etc. When
all of the above has been done, then we have
everything to perform the actual work and start
digging, in the right order that is.
In case of a mixed implementation approach (see
above strategy) this requires additional
planning, agreements and appointments.
Maintenance and tuning.
This is to eventually arrive at the aesthetics
and characteristics as defined in the strategic
vision and architecture design and to stay at
that state.
Maintenance has two important phases.
In the IT business this is called "monitoring and
tuning". The first is to maintain and "tune" the
garden during the initial growth to eventually
arrive at the aesthetic maturity that was
initially envisioned in the strategy and
architecture phase. Tuning can also involve
changing earlier choices. If, for whatever reason
a plant or material doe not " perform" as
expected or wanted then one should consider to
replace it by one that does and that should be or
by now is known to be better suited.
The second is about preservation. Once the garden
has reached its desired maturity we need to keep
it at that level. This is the daily maintenance
and is not only about pruning and clipping but
relates to everything that is subjected to change
in one way or an other.
To help you getting started we have added this
section below. In Specifics on the realization of
Tsubo-en you can read all about our
implementation.
Evocation of natural scenery is at the heart of Japanese landscape design. This is emphasized in the general guidelines at the beginning of the Sakuteiki 5 (Notes on Garden Making):
You should design each part of the garden tastefully, recalling your memories of how nature presented itself for each feature. Think over the famous places of scenic beauty throughout the land, and design your garden with the mood of harmony, modeling after the general air of such places.
|
Why are Japanese gardens so beautiful ? |
How can I, as a Westerner, realize and maintain one ? |
|
The Japanese garden is designed to represent
natural scenery but can also be very abstract.
It has traditional restraints, governed by
(often unwritten) rules, in both style and the
application of objects (artefact, ornaments,
plants). To Westerners, the location and setup, e.g. a small urban lot isolated by an enclosure, often make it appear odd and even incongruous. For most Westerners, the beauty is determined by what we see, that is the material and physical appearance, no more and no less. That is, how is a garden perceived or experienced by a Westerner without a deeper knowledge about meaning beyond the aesthetic ? Japanese gardens are disciplined and serene, the placement of every object and element means something. Something that we could learn about but not have to fully and truly understand to be able to appreciate the beauty of a Japanese garden or even to build one. The Japanese garden is the offspring of the philosophy behind it, which itself may be very difficult if not impossible to grasp for a Westerner. Learning the physical nuances in the Japanese garden by examining them based on their material characteristics can be a good way to better understand the philosophy behind it. Considering the Japanese gardens as a work of art, while increasing our knowledge about their meaning in the contexts of culture and historical perspective, will further improve the appreciation and the "experiencing of the garden", because the garden is eventually seen through the ever changing lenses, aided by the eyes but formed by the mind, with or without a Japanese cultural background. |
One important skill required to realize a
Japanese garden is the ability to create
illusions and thus influence, if not
manipulate, the mind of a spectator, with the
main purpose to make the garden appear more
natural with respect to scale, i.e. size,
proportions etc., and surrounding. Space without ornaments and colorful and abundantly blooming plants is almost unthinkable to most Westerners 7. Learning more about Japan there are so many beautiful things. The will, or even the urge to wanting them all, and include it into a garden may be the biggest Western handicap to realize an authentic, or genuine Japanese garden. Note however that a shop-window with only one object draws more attention to that objects than dozens of those will do. Also the qualities of such single object will be better done justice and appreciated. This said, the most important thing however is that you enjoy what you do and create a garden space that you can appreciate and that brings happiness to you and yours. If that means you want many of the beautiful objects in your garden, that is what you should do. In support of a discussion about your garden (to be), in many cases it will be more appropriate to not call it a Japanese garden or Japanese style garden but typify it as a Japanese, Chinese or even Asian influenced or inspired or Easterly garden. An other important skill is the art of training and pruning as over time the garden is only as good as the careful maintenance that it receives. |
|
|
|
| Art Period | Archetype | Short description | Example links |
|
6th to 8th C Yamato, Nara |
Ceremony | Worship ceremonies, including routes for worshiping. |
Ise-Jingu, Kyoto Gosho |
|
8th to 10th C Heian |
Leisure |
The
ancient capital 1300 years ago: Today a legacy from the past. |
Heijo-kyo
ruins in Nara (also Heijou-kyou) |
|
11the to 12th C Heian, Kamakura |
Paradise | Representation of Paradise on Earth. Joruri-ji Temple, in the hills near Nara, is the only existing Heian-era Amida Hall with nine images of Amida representing the nine levels of enlightenment. |
Joruri-ji, Motsuji (more Moutsuji) |
|
13th to 15th C Kamakura, Muromachi |
Zen |
Ryoan-ji is regarded the archetype Zen
garden. For additional remarks on Zen and
karesansui see below. |
Ryoan-ji, Daisen-in [ f ] |
|
16th C Momoyama |
Buke(-zukuri) | A style of residential architecture in use among the bushi or warrior class. |
Daigo-ji,
Sanpo-in Nijo-jo |
|
16th to 17th C Momoyama, Edo |
Tea |
Garden and house dedicated to the Tea Ceremony,
Cha-no-yu. |
Urasenke
Konnichian, (The Urasenke Home) Omote-senke ( Tea room and garden) |
|
17th - 19th C Edo, Meiji |
Theme |
Katsura Imperial Villa is a circuit style
garden with small and large islands connected
by bridges. Kenroku-en is "a strolling-style landscape garden". “Kenroku-en” literally means “garden that combines six characteristics”. Grouped in their traditional complementary pairs, they are spaciousness & seclusion, artifice & antiquity, water-courses & panoramas. Both gardens take full advantage of seasonal change. |
Katsura
Rikyu, Kenroku-en, Kanazawa Castle |
|
19th - 20th C Meiji - Taisho period |
Modern |
Gardens from the last century and a half. The TAU list does not include the "new type of karesansui garden". |
Murin-an, Heian-jingu See Tofuku-ji as only one splendid example. |
|
Note that Wikipedia contains a growing number
of Japanese gardens, temples etc. For
additional information it is worthwhile to give
it a try. The bold Archetypes in this table indicate the types that inspired the Tsubo-en architecture and design. |
|||
Related to Zen and karesansui we have selected a
number of phrases to give an idea of direction and to
show an impression of how concrete and tangible the
design guidance are.
One, if not the most, important aspect (design
principle) is the fact that a Zen
garden is a three-dimensional visualization of
monochrome ink (sumi)
landscape paintings,
sumi-e or suibokuga. This still is the art-form
by many most closely associated with Zen
Buddhism.
Rather then having perspective based on a common
point of convergency, like that used in the West, the
(original Song China) technique prescribes separation
of the vista into three, or more, tiers or planes.
The first and closest tier, on a human scale, the
second or middle-tier on architectural scale, and the
third tier, on a geologic scale. The tiers are
painted on top of each other and separated by white
space that suggests mist and haziness and distance.
The lower tier represents the foreground drawn in
"human" proportions with recognizable relatively
small objects. Even leafs on plants and animals are
clearly distinguishable. The second, mostly
middle-tier, gets more distant, bridging the distance
between the foreground and upper or background tier.
The impression of distance is further attained
through diminishing size and further away objects
becoming indistinct. Far away mountains are often
veiled in mist or clouds.
This also explains the often used technique of
incorporating a stream, river or waterfall that comes
"out of nothing" into the middle or foreground, where
nothing is an unknown background (dark) from where it
originates or rises.
Interestingly a three-dimensional real and full-size
landscape is reduces and projected in tiers or planes
on a two-dimensional, flat surface of a sheet of
paper, which on its turn gets interpreted back to
again become a three-dimensional miniature, but
larger scale than the painting, landscape. The
starting point that this is a primary design
principle has great impact on the architecture and
further design and selection phases. Scale now
becomes an extremely important aspect as does
distinguishability. In chapter Tsukiyama you find an example related to
the Tsubo-en realization. The above link:
monochrome ink shows a great example from The
Metropolitan Museum of Art.
More examples are available in
Monochrome landscape ink painting examples
and Samurai residence gardens of the Edo era.
In the Literature
[ f ] you find a fine presentation with
great ink paintings of Shubun and Sesshu and material
on Daitoku-ji complex and the Daisen-in
subtemple.
The temple Daitoku-ji is the head temple of the
Daitoku school of the Rinzai sect of Zen Buddhism. It
was founded in 1319, but was destroyed by a fire and
was rebuilt in the 16th century. This enormous temple
complex has 24 subtemples forming what resembles a
small village. Along with the Tofuku-ji and Nanzen-ji
it is one of the largest Zen temples in Japan. Among
the subtemples, the Daisen-in boasts a superb "dry
landscape" rock garden. The
Ryogen-in is said to be the smallest Zen garden
in Japan.
This is what the brochure states from the the
subtemple Daisen-in:
"Since ancient times, the Japanese have loved
Nature profoundly and desired to live according to
Nature.
But in such a narrow space (about 100m2)
it was impossible to realize Nature in details.
However Kogaku-Zenji was able to express the
abstracted essence of Nature by means of rocks and
sand.
If you look at this garden after seeing the landscape
painted by Soami (
Kangaku Shinso) on the sliding doors, you may
also find out that such a type of garden is nothing
but a three-dimensional reproduction of monochrome
landscape paintings."
... A real landscape seen from a high and distant
viewpoint best exemplifies the landscape painting
style.
Dõgen, an early medieval Zen priest
(1200-1253):
"Don't mistake simple, actual nature (mountains,
rivers, the big earth) for actual nature that
constitutes the pure essence of nature".
.... mountains and islands within a garden, they
express the energetic constellation of nature.
They offer the garden-maker a symbolic language in
which to state the more profound truth of nature,
which lay's beneath its aesthetic surface.
...they are best appreciated from fixed vantage
points, such as from inside the "shoin"
(reception room), where they can be viewed as
three-dimensional pictures framed by the rectangular
lines of the building.
... This design no longer starts from existing
models in nature, but is better understood as an
intellectual projection onto nature, moving from
land-scape to mind-scape.